Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

In South Africa, curriculum change remains a crucial national concern, particularly in secondary schools, where educational reform efforts intersect with broader concerns about equity, access to knowledge, and teacher autonomy. This study investigates how secondary school teachers understand and enact their professional agency in the face of curriculum change. Using an ecological framework of an agency, it examines how teachers perceive their roles as change agents, the factors that affect their choices, and their interaction with policy-driven changes. Using a quantitative design, the study collected responses through a structured questionnaire administered in 41 schools in the Northwest province of South Africa. Descriptive statistical analysis showed that although many teachers demonstrate a strong sense of professional responsibility and a deep commitment to curriculum goals, they are frequently constrained in their ability to act by external factors, including unequal access to resources, top-down policy mandates, and inadequate professional development. According to the results, teacher agency is influenced by the relationships they build within those settings, as well as by the institutional contexts in which they operate. In the end, the study emphasizes the necessity of rethinking teacher development frameworks to prioritize teacher voice, foster local innovation, and promote agency as a major factor in meaningful curriculum reform. For policymakers, school administrators, and curriculum developers seeking a more inclusive and responsive science education system in post-apartheid South Africa, these insights have significant implications.

Keywords

Teacher Agency curriculum change Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) educational reform ecological model

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Motsepe, M., Sedumedi, T., & Rankhumise, M. (2026). Understanding Teacher Agency During Curriculum Transitions: A Case Study of Secondary School Natural Science Teachers in South Africa. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 11(1), 40-61. https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v11i1.301

References

  1. Agumba, H. O., & Dasoo, N. (2024). EMS Teachers’ Experiences in Curriculum Change. IJLTER. PDF.
  2. Amukobole, C., & Macheng, P. (2023). Exploring teacher agency in curriculum enactment in rural African schools. African Education Review.
  3. Avalos, B. (2019). Teacher professional learning and development in the Global South. International Review of Education, 65(1), 7–21.
  4. Bertram, C., & Christiansen, I. (2020). Understanding Research: An Introduction to Reading Research in Education. Van Schaik.
  5. Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the life course. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149.
  6. Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–638.
  7. Botha, J. (2020). Standardisation and science curriculum reform: Teacher autonomy in the CAPS era. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(4), 523–541.
  8. Chisholm, L., & Wildeman, R. (2019). Policy reform and curriculum coherence in post-apartheid South Africa.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  10. Day, C., & Sammons, P. (2020). Successful School Leadership. Education Development Trust.
  11. Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2019). School Monitoring Survey: National Report 2017. Pretoria: DBE.
  12. De Villiers, R. (2023). Comparative insights on teacher agency in African contexts. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 45–62.
  13. Dlamini, N., & Mthiyane, S. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on CAPS implementation in KwaZulu-Natal. South African Journal of Education, 41(3), 1–10.
  14. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.
  15. Govender, D. (2022). Rural teachers and constrained agency. Perspectives in Education, 40(2), 55–70.
  16. Hoadley, U. (2020). Curriculum and pedagogy in South African schools. In N. Spaull & J. Jansen (Eds.), South African schooling: The enigma of inequality (pp. 107–126). Springer.
  17. Jansen, J. (1998). Curriculum reform in South Africa: A critical analysis. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(3), 321–331.
  18. Kennedy, A. (2016). Professional learning and the complexity of teacher agency. Professional Development in Education, 42(1), 22–35.
  19. Kennedy, A. (2019). Empowering teachers through professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 524–538.
  20. Mahlangu, V., & Beckmann, J. (2021). Curriculum responsiveness in rural schools. Education as Change, 25(1), 90–109.
  21. Makeleni, M., & Sethusha, M. (2020). The role of professional development in curriculum agency. SAJE, 40(1), 1–10.
  22. Mampane, S. (2022). Teachers' reflective practices in curriculum adaptation. Journal of Educational Studies, 21(2), 44–61.
  23. Maringe, F., & Moletsane, R. (2024). Policy assumptions and school realities in curriculum implementation.
  24. Mgqwashu, E. (2022). Teachers as agents of change: Curriculum transformation and decoloniality in South African schools. Education as Change, 26(1), a1365.
  25. Mitchell, C., & Sadati, S. M. H. (2024). Re-visioning Cellphilming and Curriculum Innovation. Springer.
  26. Mkhabela, T. P., & Khoza, S. B. (2023). Exploring rural teachers’ experiences of implementing the CAPS curriculum in multi-grade settings. Education as Change, 27(1), 1–17.
  27. Mkhabela, T.P., & Khoza, S. B. (2023). School management and curriculum support in under-resourced contexts. Perspectives in Education, 41(1), 56–72.
  28. Mkhize, L. M. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on curriculum reform: Lessons from implementation. Africa Education Review, 20(3), 345–361.
  29. Ngcobo, T. S., & Muthukrishna, N. (2020). Exploring teacher agency in curriculum implementation: A South African case study. Education as Change, 24(1), 1–19.
  30. Ngcobo, T.S., & Muthukrishna, N. (2020). Rural teachers’ curriculum enactment challenges. Journal of Education, 79, 75–94.
  31. Ngcoza, K., & Southwood, S. (2021). Teachers’ negotiation of curriculum reform initiatives. AJRMSTE, 25(1), 88–102.
  32. Pantić, N., & Florian, L. (2020). Developing teacher agency for inclusive education: A relational approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103103.
  33. Pitsoe, V. J., & Letseka, M. (2018). Curriculum and assessment policy statement: Re-contextualising teacher autonomy and compliance. South African Journal of Education, 38(2), 1–9.
  34. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  35. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2021). Teacher agency: An ecological approach (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
  36. Sayed, Y., & Singh, M. (2021). South African teachers and curriculum implementation: Constraints and possibilities.
  37. Schleicher, A. (2023). The Future of Education and Skills: OECD Insights. OECD Publishing.
  38. Soudien, C. (2010). What to teach in the new South Africa? Southern African Review of Education, 16(1), 31–45.
  39. Spaull, N., & Jansen, J. (2019). South African Schooling: The Enigma of Inequality. Springer.
  40. Tao, X., & Gao, X. (2021). Teacher agency in curriculum reform: A systematic review of recent research. Educational Research Review, 33, 100393.
  41. Timperley, H. (2021). Leading professional learning. New Zealand Journal of Educational Leadership, 36(2), 5–21.
  42. Toom, A., Husu, J., & Patrikainen, S. (2021). Teacher agency as a key to curriculum reform.
  43. Vandeyar, S. (2020). Teachers as agents of change in unequal education contexts. Educational Research for Social Change, 9(1), 42–56.